Navigating Practice Issues Related to the Unsatisfactory Cervicovaginal Papanicolaou Test: Survey Results of Laboratories Participating in the 2020 College of American Pathologists PAP Education Program.

CONTEXT.­: Unsatisfactory Papanicolaou (Pap) tests pose a unique set of challenges to the laboratory with regard to their processing, review, reporting, and performance of human papillomavirus (HPV) testing. There are no standardized guidelines for the review process and handling of unsatisfactory Pap tests. OBJECTIVE.­: To assess the current practice patterns regarding various aspects of the unsatisfactory Pap test, from processing to reporting, across laboratories worldwide. DESIGN.­: A supplemental questionnaire was mailed to laboratories participating in the 2020 College of American Pathologists (CAP) Gynecologic Cytopathology (PAP Education) Program, requesting data regarding the unsatisfactory Pap test. RESULTS.­: Of 1520 participating laboratories, 619 (40.7%) responded, and the responses of 577 laboratories were included for further analysis. Only 64.6% (373 of 577) laboratories used the unsatisfactory Pap test criteria as specified by the 2014 Bethesda System. About three-quarters of the respondents (433 of 576; 75.2%) routinely rescreened unsatisfactory Pap tests. Routine repreparation of such Pap tests was performed by 54.9% (316 of 576) of laboratories, and 52.0% (293 of 563) used glacial acetic acid for repreparing excessively bloody specimens. HPV test results were reported for unsatisfactory Pap tests, always or sometimes, by 62.4% (353 of 566) of respondents. CONCLUSIONS.­: This CAP survey reveals important information regarding the practice patterns pertaining to several aspects of the unsatisfactory Pap test. It also provides valuable insight into the quality assurance measures that can be implemented for such tests. Future studies can further aid in the standardization of all components of the handling of unsatisfactory Pap tests for overall quality improvement.

Performance of specific morphologic features in distinguishing low-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions from high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions in borderline cases: a College of American Pathologists Cytopathology Committee multiobserver study.

INTRODUCTION: Distinguishing between low-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions (LSIL) and high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions (HSIL) can be difficult on certain Papanicolaou (Pap) tests, hindering interobserver concordance. We investigated the variables influencing the interpretation of LSIL versus HSIL in Pap test slides rejected from the College of American Pathologists PAP education program. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Eleven cytologists, who were unaware of the reference interpretation, examined 21 Pap slides (11 submitted as LSIL and 10 as HSIL) rejected from the PAP education program and recorded the number of LSIL cells, HSIL cells, keratinized dysplastic cells, LSIL clusters with mixed HSIL cells, atypical squamous metaplasia, atypical glandular cells, the presence of inflammation or infectious organisms, and the overall interpretation (LSIL or HSIL). We evaluated the significance of these 11 variables using a nonlinear mixed model analysis. RESULTS: LSIL had greater concordance (92 of 121 responses; 76.0% concordance) than HSIL (68 of 110 responses; 61.8% concordance; P < 0.001). The only predictors of misclassified cases were the number of atypical squamous metaplastic cells and the number of HSIL cells (P < 0.001). The more of these cells identified, the more likely the reviewers were to classify the slide as HSIL. The reproducibility of the diagnosis was fair (Gwet's agreement coefficient, 0.33). CONCLUSIONS: Interobserver reproducibility is a challenge for a subset of cases with features intermediate between LSIL and HSIL. Atypical squamous metaplasia and dysplastic nuclei with a nuclear/cytoplasmic ratio greater than one half of the cell volume (HSIL) present on a Pap test influenced the likelihood that a reviewer would interpret the case as HSIL rather than LSIL.

Rescreening Practices of Negative Papanicolaou Tests With Positive Human Papillomavirus Test Result.

CONTEXT.­: The yield of the prospective rescreening process for "negative for intraepithelial lesion or malignancy" (NILM) Papanicolaou (Pap) tests is higher with the inclusion of a greater proportion of high-risk cases. One of the suggested criteria for classifying a Pap test finding as high risk is recent or concurrent high-risk human papillomavirus (HPV) positivity. OBJECTIVE.­: To evaluate how the results of HPV testing have been incorporated in the prospective rescreening of NILM Pap tests across a wide range of laboratories. DESIGN.­: A questionnaire survey was sent to laboratories participating in the 2019 College of American Pathologists (CAP) Gynecologic Cytology (PAP Education) Program. RESULTS.­: Of the 1507 participating laboratories, 667 (44%) responded to the survey. Most laboratories (59.4%; 396 of 667) had not incorporated HPV test/genotyping results to select NILM Pap tests for rescreening. Amongst the remaining laboratories, for NILM HPV-positive Pap test results, 112 (16.8%) had a policy to rescreen by a cytotechnologist only, 51 (7.6%) by a pathologist only, and 86 (12.9%) by both. Of 264 laboratories, 181 (68.6%) reported the cytology upon availability of the HPV test result and completion of the secondary review. Of 661 laboratories, 145 (21.9%) included consensus-type recommendations in the cytology report for such Pap tests. CONCLUSIONS.­: This CAP survey provides significant information regarding the current trends in the use of HPV test results in prospective rescreening of NILM Pap tests. Future studies on quality improvement can further assist in the standardization of this process across different laboratories.

The Differential Diagnosis of Reparative Changes and Malignancy: Performance in the College of American Pathologists Pap Education and Proficiency Testing Programs.

CONTEXT.­: Repair is a challenging diagnosis and a significant source of false-positive (FP) interpretations in cervical cytology. No large-scale study of performance of repair in the liquid-based era has been performed. OBJECTIVE.­: To evaluate the performance of repair in the College of American Pathologists Pap Education and Proficiency Testing (PT) programs. DESIGN.­: The FP rate for slides classified as repair was evaluated by preparation type, participant type (cytotechnologist, pathologist, or laboratory), and program. The specific misdiagnosis category and individual slide performance were also evaluated. The rate of misclassification of slides as repair by participants for other diagnostic categories in the Pap Education program was assessed. RESULTS.­: The overall FP rate was 1700 of 12 715 (13.4%). There was no significant difference by program or preparation type. Within the Education program there was no difference by participant type, but pathologists' FP rate in the PT program (47 of 514, 9.1%) was significantly better than cytotechnologists in the PT program (51 of 380, 13.4%) and pathologists in the Education program (690 of 4900, 14.1%). High-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions/cancers (HSIL+) accounted for 1380 of 1602 FP interpretations (86%) in Education, but 43 of 98 (43.9%) in PT. Most slides had a low rate of misclassification, but a small number were poor performers. False-negative diagnosis of HSIL+ as repair was less common, ranging from 0.7% to 1.8%. CONCLUSIONS.­: Despite initial indications that liquid-based cytology might reduce the rate of misclassification of repair, FP interpretations remain common and are no different by preparation type. Misclassification is most commonly as HSIL or carcinoma, potentially resulting in significant patient harm.

Bethesda 2014 Implementation and Human Papillomavirus Primary Screening: Practices of Laboratories Participating in the College of American Pathologists PAP Education Program.

CONTEXT.­: Cervical cancer screening laboratory practices may evolve with new terminology and technologies. OBJECTIVE.­: To investigate changes in cervical cytopathology practice resulting from the 2014 Bethesda System updates and screening technologies. DESIGN.­: Questionnaires accompanied 2016 and 2017 mailings of the College of American Pathologists PAP Education program. RESULTS.­: In 2016, most laboratories surveyed had adopted or were planning to adopt 2014 Bethesda System updates, and the majority (53%; 365 of 689) used an age cutoff of 45 for reporting benign-appearing endometrial cells. However, 51.3% (354 of 690) of laboratories used the term low-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion, cannot exclude high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion, for cases with indeterminate features, and 44.9% (298 of 664) of laboratories used a 5000-cell cutoff for minimum squamous cellularity for posthysterectomy and posttherapy specimens. Reporting rates for cervical cytology metrics changed very little from 2013 to 2016, and the median ratio of atypical squamous cells to squamous intraepithelial lesion cases was 1.9 for ThinPrep and 1.8 for SurePath preparations. Most laboratories (59.4%; 389 of 655) did not offer stand-alone primary human papillomavirus (HPV) testing in 2017, and primary HPV testing accounted for a low proportion of HPV testing volumes. The Roche Cobas method was the most common platform for HPV primary screening. CONCLUSIONS.­: These questionnaire surveys provide data about the current status of cervical cytology screening, including changes related to the 2014 Bethesda System updates and the adoption of HPV primary screening techniques.

Low-Grade Squamous Intraepithelial Lesion or High-Grade Squamous Intraepithelial Lesion? Concordance Between the Interpretation of Low-Grade Squamous Intraepithelial Lesion and High-Grade Squamous Intraepithelial Lesion in Papanicolaou Tests: Results From the College of American Pathologists PAP Education Program.

CONTEXT.­: Obtaining diagnostic concordance for squamous intraepithelial lesions in cytology can be challenging. OBJECTIVE.­: To determine diagnostic concordance for biopsy-proven low-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion (LSIL) and high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion (HSIL) Papanicolaou test slides in the College of American Pathologists PAP Education program. DESIGN.­: We analyzed 121 059 responses from 4251 LSIL and HSIL slides for the interval 2004 to 2013 using a nonlinear mixed-model fit for reference diagnosis, preparation type, and participant type. We evaluated interactions between the reference diagnosis and the other 2 factors in addition to a repeated-measures component to adjust for slide-specific performance. RESULTS.­: There was a statistically significant difference between misclassification of LSIL (2.4%; 1384 of 57 664) and HSIL (4.4%; 2762 of 63 395). There was no performance difference between pathologists and cytotechnologists for LSIL, but cytotechnologists had a significantly higher HSIL misclassification rate than pathologists (5.5%; 1437 of 27 534 versus 4.0%; 1032 of 25 630; P = .01), and both were more likely to misrepresent HSIL as LSIL ( P < .001) than the reverse. ThinPrep LSIL slides were more likely to be misclassified as HSIL (2.4%; 920 of 38 582) than SurePath LSIL slides (1.5%; 198 of 13 196), but conventional slides were the most likely to be misclassified in both categories (4.5%; 266 of 5886 for LSIL, and 6.5%; 573 of 8825 for HSIL). CONCLUSIONS.­: More participants undercalled HSIL as LSIL (false-negative) than overcalled LSIL as HSIL (false-positive) in the PAP Education program, with conventional slides more likely to be misclassified than ThinPrep or SurePath slides. Pathologists and cytotechnologists classify LSIL equally well, but cytotechnologists are significantly more likely to undercall HSIL as LSIL than are pathologists.

Targeted literature review of the humanistic and economic burden of adult growth hormone deficiency.

BACKGROUND: Quality of life (QoL) and health economic data are becoming increasingly important factors in healthcare decision making. While there is a wealth of information establishing the benefit of growth hormone (GH) replacement therapy in adults with growth hormone deficiency (aGHD), recent reviews on the QoL and health economic impact of aGHD and the effect of treatment on these factors is limited. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this article is to summarize the impact of early and sustained treatment on the QoL and economic burden of aGHD by conducting a targeted literature review. METHODS: Standard electronic databases, including PubMed and the Cochrane collaboration website, were searched for publications between January 2006 and July 2016 for evidence of the humanistic and economic burden of aGHD. Search terms included growth hormone deficiency, health-related quality of life, HRQoL, patient-reported outcomes, outcome assessment, well-being and adherence. RESULTS: The literature search identified 732 initial hits and a final 14 publications were included. The analysis showed that the economic burden of aGHD is largely driven by the productivity losses associated with the disease. This is because most patients with aGHD are of working age and the QoL domains (memory & concentration and energy & vitality) most commonly affected by aGHD severely impair a person's ability to work and may limit their contribution to society. CONCLUSION: Untreated aGHD can seriously affect patients' functioning. Early and continued treatment with GH replacement therapy could potentially improve the QoL and reduce the economic burden associated with aGHD. This review has limitations: only English language articles published since January 2006 were included and many of the studies were conducted in the Nordic countries; it is unclear how representative these studies are of the population as a whole. This was a literature review and not a systematic review, as it was thought to be unlikely that, in this rare disease, any additional publications would have been identified. Overall, this review reveals a paucity of data in this underserved population and points to research gaps which could be addressed with new studies.

False-Negative Interpretation of Adenocarcinoma In Situ in the College of American Pathologists Gynecologic PAP Education Program.

CONTEXT: - Adenocarcinoma in situ (AIS) is difficult to correctly interpret on Papanicolaou (Pap) cytology slides and false-negative interpretations of AIS can cause significant problems in daily practice. OBJECTIVE: - To investigate the false-negative interpretation rate of AIS and the factors related to false-negative interpretation through responses in an educational environment. DESIGN: - We retrospectively evaluated 11 337 responses in the PAP Education Program (PAP-Edu) from 173 AIS slides from 2011 to 2015. The false-negative interpretation rate, most common false-negative interpretations, and related other factors were evaluated. RESULTS: - The overall false-negative rate was 6.9% (784 of 11 337). Respondents correctly interpreted AIS 50.0% (5667 of 11 337) of the time; high-grade intraepithelial lesion (HSIL) and malignancies (adenocarcinoma, squamous cell carcinoma, and other carcinomas) accounted for 42.7% (4842 of 11 337) and low-grade intraepithelial lesion accounted for 0.4% (44 of 11 337) of responses. Overall, 92.7% (10 509 of 11 337) of responses were HSIL and above. Among 784 false-negative responses, negative for intraepithelial lesion or malignancy was the most common (61.5% [482 of 784]), followed by reparative changes (24.1% [189 of 784]) and atrophic vaginitis (7.7% [60 of 784]). Overall, pathologists' responses showed a significantly higher false-negative rate than cytotechnologists' responses (8.3%, 403 of 4835 versus 5.7%, 275 of 4816; P < .001). The false-negative response rates were not statistically different among preparation types. CONCLUSIONS: - The low correct interpretation rate and higher false-negative rate for AIS demonstrate the difficulty in interpreting AIS on Pap cytology, which may cause clinical consequences. The higher false-negative rate with pathologists than with cytotechnologists suggests cytotechnologists' higher screening sensitivity for AIS or cautious interpretation to avoid false-positive results by pathologists.

Update on the College of American Pathologists Experience With High-Risk Human Papillomavirus Proficiency Testing for Cytology.

CONTEXT: - Since 2008, the College of American Pathologists has provided the human papillomavirus for cytology laboratories (CHPV) proficiency testing program to help laboratories meet the requirements of the Clinical Laboratory Improvement Amendments of 1988. OBJECTIVES: - To provide an update on trends in proficiency testing performance in the College of American Pathologists CHPV program during the 4-year period from 2011 through 2014 and to compare those trends with the preceding first 3 years of the program. DESIGN: - Responses of laboratories participating in the CHPV program from 2011 through 2014 were analyzed using a nonlinear mixed model to compare different combinations of testing medium and platform. RESULTS: - In total, 818 laboratories participated in the CHPV program at least once during the 4 years, with participation increasing during the study period. Concordance of participant responses with the target result was more than 98% (38 280 of 38 892). Overall performance with all 3 testing media-ThinPrep (Hologic, Bedford, Massachusetts), SurePath (Becton, Dickinson and Company, Franklin Lakes, New Jersey), or Digene (Qiagen, Valencia, California)-was equivalent (P = .51), and all 4 US Food and Drug Administration (FDA)-approved platforms-Hybrid Capture 2 (Qiagen), Cervista (Hologic), Aptima (Hologic), and cobas (Roche Molecular Systems, Pleasanton, California)-outperformed laboratory-developed tests, unspecified commercial kits, and other (noncommercial) methods in ThinPrep medium (P < .001). However, certain off-label combinations of platform and medium, most notably Cervista with SurePath, demonstrated suboptimal performance (P < .001). CONCLUSIONS: - Laboratories demonstrated proficiency in using various combinations of testing media and platforms offered in the CHPV program, with statistically significant performance differences in certain combinations. These observations may be relevant in the current discussions about FDA oversight of laboratory-developed tests.

Human Papillomavirus Genotyping Testing Practice in 2014: Results of a College of American Pathologists National Survey.

CONTEXT: - College of American Pathologists (CAP) surveys are used to establish national benchmarks for laboratories. OBJECTIVE: - To investigate human papillomavirus (HPV) genotyping testing practice patterns in laboratories in 2014. DESIGN: - Data were analyzed from the CAP HPV Genotyping Practices Supplemental Questionnaire distributed to 749 laboratories participating in the CAP Human Papillomavirus (High Risk) for Cytology Program. RESULTS: - Six hundred four of 749 laboratories (80.6%) responded to the survey. More laboratories offered HPV genotyping testing and performed in-house HPV genotyping testing as compared to previous surveys. The Roche cobas HPV test was the most commonly used genotyping method (37.0%; 160 of 433), followed by Hologic Aptima HPV16 18/45 (26.1%; 113 of 433) and Hologic Cervista HPV16/18 (14.3%; 62 of 433). Most laboratories (287 of 399; 71.9%) offered HPV genotyping for high-risk HPV cases regardless of Papanicolaou (Pap) test results and patient age; this pattern was more common in laboratories using cobas. The remaining laboratories specifically offered testing to women with a negative Pap test result at age 30 years and older (65.2%, 73 of 112) or all ages (37.5%, 42 of 112). The median reporting rates of HPV16 and/or HPV18 positivity were 20.6%, 25.7%, 21.1%, and 57.4% for women with positive high-risk HPV adjunctive negative Pap results, atypical squamous cells of undermined significance, low-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion, and high-grade squamous lesion, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: - Human papillomavirus genotyping testing has increased. Roche cobas and Hologic Aptima genotype methods were the most common, and laboratories using cobas usually offered genotyping regardless of Pap test result and age. The data provide a baseline and trend of HPV genotyping test practices in 2014.